Matrimony
Home
Gregorian Masses
News - SSPX vis-a-vis Rome
About Site Originator
Site Purpose
SSPX Overview
AGENDA - Section 1
AGENDA - Section 2
AGENDA - Section 3
AGENDA - Section 4
AGENDA - Section 5
AGENDA - Section 6
AGENDA - Section 7
AGENDA - Section 8
AGENDA - Section 9
AGENDA - Section 10
Canonical History of SSPX
Ecclesia Dei - Apostolic Letter of John Paul II
Matrimony
Penance
Sunday Obligation
FIDELITY ARTICLE - Cardinal Lara and the Vanishing Schism
FIDELITY ARTICLE - The Vanishing Schism Revisited: Will the Real Cardinal Lara Stand Up (Again)?
FIDELITY ARTICLE - How I Won the Debate (with Michael Davies)
FIDELITY ARTICLE - In the Line of Fire: Fr. John Rizzo, Ex-SSPX
FIDELITY ARTICLE - Letters to the Editor, December 1992
FIDELITY ARTICLE - Letters to the Editor, February 1993
FIDELITY ARTICLE - Marcel Lefebvre: Signatory to Dignitatis Humanae
FIDELITY ARTICLE - No Ordinary Bishop
FIDELITY ARTICLE - Schism, Obedience and the Society of St. Pius X
FIDELITY ARTICLE - Schism of Lefebvre: Review of Nemeth's The Case of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre
FIDELITY ARTICLE - Society of St. Pius X Gets Sick (the article that started it all)
FIDELITY ARTICLE - Tridentine Rite Conference and Its Schismatic Cousins - Part One
FIDELITY ARTICLE - Tridentine Rite Conference and Its Schismatic Cousins - Part Two
GRUNER - Fr. Nicholas Gruner
GRUNER - Wanderer Article - Canon Law and Fr. Gruner's Suspension "A Divinis"
MISC. ARTICLES - After 25 Years, Rome to Reassess 1983 Code of Canon Law
MISC. ARTICLES - Archbishop Lefebvre and Canons 1323:4° and 1324 §1:5
MISC. ARTICLES - Bishop and the Protocols
MISC. ARTICLES - Can. 844 §2 -- Can a Catholic Approach an SSPX Priest for the Sacraments?
MISC. ARTICLES - Candid Admissions of Bishop Tissier de Mallerais
MISC. ARTICLES - Caught in the Lie
MISC. ARTICLES - Consecration of Bishops and Papal Authority
MISC. ARTICLES - Custom and the 1962 Roman Missal
MISC. ARTICLES - Declaration by Pontifical Council for the Interpretation of Legislative Texts
MISC. ARTICLES - Ecclesia Dei: Apostolic Letter of John Paul II
MISC. ARTICLES - Decree of Excommunication
MISC. ARTICLES - Excommunication of Followers of Archbishop Lefebvre
MISC. ARTICLES - Fooling Some of the People Some of the Time
MISC. ARTICLES - Fraternite Notre Dame (another off-the-wall group)
MISC. ARTICLES - Habemus Papam? (Do we have a Pope?)
MISC. ARTICLES - Howard Walsh
MISC. ARTICLES - Introduction to the Lefebvrist Schism
MISC. ARTICLES - Italian Police name SSPX as Cult
MISC. ARTICLES - Jury Finds Church Liable for Slander, Distress
MISC. ARTICLES - Lefebvre and Padre Pio
MISC. ARTICLES - Letter to Cardinal Ratzinger (consequences of patronizing the SSPX)
MISC. ARTICLES - Letter of Msgr. Perl
MISC. ARTICLES - Mark of Shiva on Pope and Nudity at Papal Mass
MISC. ARTICLES - Mel Gibson's Church
MISC. ARTICLES - Morrison: Is He a Priest?
MISC. ARTICLES - Nebraska Excommunications Allowed to Stand
MISC. ARTICLES - No Salvation Outside the Church
MISC. ARTICLES - Old Catholics
MISC. ARTICLES - Open Letter to Confused Traditionalists
MISC. ARTICLES - Ottaviani Repudiates "Intervention"
MISC. ARTICLES - Protocol
MISC. ARTICLES - SSPX in Australia
MISC. ARTICLES -SSPX Vis-A-Vis Vatican I
MISC. ARTICLES - Thuc
MISC. ARTICLES - Traditionalism: True & False
MISC. ARTICLES - Vatican Approves New Traditionalist Institute - 090806
MISC. ARTICLES - Was the Tridentine Mass Banned by Pope Paul VI?

powered by lycos
SEARCH:Tripod The Web

THE LAW

The pertinent sections of Canon Law which are of importance to the patrons of the SSPX (indeed, to all Catholics) respecting the administration of the sacrament of matrimony are follows:

MATRIMONY

Canon 1111

Section 2 - To be valid the delegation of the faculty to assist at marriages must be given expressly to specified persons; if it is a question of a special delegation, it is to be granted for a specific marriage; however, if it is a question of a general delegation, it is to be granted in writing.

COMMENT: As Society priests have not approached the local bishops for this faculty they are not "specified persons" as referred to in this canon and they most assuredly do not have such a grant in writing from the local bishop. Being married before a Society priest is no different, for a Catholic, than being married by a Justice of the Peace, a Protestant minister, or a ship's captain. In other words, it is no marriage at all.

It should be noted that in these canons the law uses the word valid and not licit (lawful, permitted, properly). A priest administering sacraments without the proper authority may be doing something illegal but the sacraments confected would still have the desired effect for the faithful. The administration of the sacraments would have been illicit but not invalid -- except in the case of Penance and Matrimony. In the case of these two sacraments the law uses the word valid - not licit. Therefore, confessions and marriages are without effect as these canons have not been observed.

It would seem the reason these two have been excluded is because the mind of the Church most likely intended a penalty upon the laity for adherence to an errant cleric (or schismatic sect) acting beyond authority and, therefore, in opposition to the Church. It is clear from these canons that the laity are not free to adhere to priests lacking faculties.

With respect to the part of Canon 969, section 1, after the semicolon, it must be remembered that, ultimately, all authority for the dispensing of the sacraments resides with Rome. Therefore, no superior of the Society is able to grant lawful faculties as he (as with all Society priests) is not in communion with Rome and does not possess legitimate authority to grant faculties.